Menu

Zondo Commission

Diversity and Ethics (2)

SANEF Notes With Deep Concern Allegation Against Ranjeni Munusamy

,

Journalist Ranjeni Munusamy

The South African National Editors’ Forum (SANEF) has noted the testimony of Colonel Kobus Roelofse at the Commission of Inquiry into State Capture on 18 September 2019, implicating Tiso Blackstar senior journalist Ranjeni Munusamy in accepting gratification from the Crime Intelligence unit.

Roelofse testified that he uncovered a payment of R143 621.78 from a secret slush fund of the police’s Crime Intelligence unit towards Munusamy’s vehicle finance account in July 2008. At the time, Munusamy worked as a communications consultant for clients, including the Friends of Jacob Zuma trust.

SANEF has noted Munusamy’s denial of the allegation and welcomes her decision to cooperate with the Zondo Commission.

SANEF champions ethical journalism and has launched its own Inquiry into Media Credibility and Ethics, chaired by retired judge Kathleen Satchwell. We encourage any South African with evidence of journalists acting unethically or illegally to approach Judge Satchwell and the authorities, including the Zondo Commission.

Email [email protected] for submissions to the Inquiry.

In terms of Munusamy, we welcome the decision by Tiso Blackstar to grant her special leave to deal with this serious allegation.

We will closely follow Munusamy’s cooperation with the Zondo Commission and will await the outcome of Tiso Blackstar’s internal investigation.

For more information please contact:

  • Mahlatse Mahlase – SANEF Chairperson 083 399-2852
  • Sam Mkokeli – SANEF Media Freedom Chairperson, 082 084 2051
  • Kate Skinner – SANEF Executive Director 082 926 6404

 

Cases

SANEF Fights Intimidation Of Journalists in the Equality Court

, ,

The South African National Editors’ Forum’s (SANEF) court case against the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) starts today (on August 5, 2019) in the Pretoria High Court, sitting as the Equality Court.

SANEF and a number of individual journalists have taken the EFF to the Equality Court to argue that the latter has enabled an environment in which intimidation, harassment, threats and/ or assaults on journalists including the individual complainants, in this case, have been tolerated and in fact encouraged, creating a chilling effect on freedom of expression, access to information and freedom of the media in the country.

In response the EFF has argued that they do not know – and have no control over – the people responsible for the barrage of online harassment journalists receive daily. However, SANEF believes this is not correct. We believe that the EFF leadership have a duty to publically condemn the actions of their supporters when they harass and intimidate journalists and they have systematically chosen not to. We believe that this has created an environment within which EFF supporters, and others, have felt justified in threatening journalists.

We state in our court papers that we do not think journalists are above criticism – we encourage criticism. However, we oppose threats, harassment, intimidation and assaults. Further, we believe criticism should be tested and weighed up through channels such as the Press Council, the Broadcasting Complaints Commission of South Africa, ICASA and the Courts. We have noted that the EFF has specifically chosen not to subject their criticisms – including allegations that journalists operate as politicians – to these structures so that these criticisms can be tested and verified.

A further set of issues raised by the EFF is that the protection afforded by the Equality Act does not extend to journalists and the journalist profession. SANEF, however, contends that the Act does indeed make space for journalists to be protected by virtue of their occupation.

Finally, Mr Malema, President of the EFF, denies that his speech, made to his supporters outside the Zondo Commission in Johannesburg on 20 November 2018 – the trigger for this court case – constituted hate speech and incitement to violence against journalists. He claimed that in certain sections of his speech he had called for restraint, including in particular restraint in terms of women journalists. However, SANEF believes that he selectively and opportunistically quotes only a single section of his speech. We believe that in other sections he clearly called for violent action against journalists. Further, he named particular journalists who were then mercilessly trolled.

SANEF is hoping that this court case – together with other recent court cases fighting harassment of journalists e.g. Karima Brown’s case against the EFF – will begin to build and rebuild an environment where journalists can do their work i.e. to report without fear or favour and to hold the powerful to account.

COURT DOCUMENTS UPDATED:

https://sanef.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Part-1.pdf

https://sanef.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Part-2.pdf

https://sanef.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Part-3.pdf

The EFF answering papers here:

https://sanef.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/2019.07.03-EFF-Response-Part-1.pdf

https://sanef.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/2019.07.03-EFF-Response-Part-2.pdf

Annexures to the EFF papers

All Sanef replying affidavits single document

# 1. SANEF Affidavit

# 2_SANEF v EFF – Munusamy RA – 16 July 2019

# 3_SANEF v EFF – Van Wyk – Replying Affidavit – 16 July 2019

# 4_SANEF v EFF – Adrian Basson – Replying Affidavit – 16 July 2019

# 5_SANEF v EFF – Du Preez RA – 16 July 2019

# 6_SANEF v EFF – Bateman – Replying Affidavit – 16 July 2019

The Media Monitoring Africa MMA’s amicus papers

For more information please contact:

  • Mahlatse Mahlase – SANEF Chairperson, 083 399 2852
  • Sam Mkokeli – SANEF Media Freedom Chairperson, 082 084 2051
  • Janet Heard – SANEF Western Cape SANEF Convenor, 0780419528
  • Judy Sandison – SANEF KZN Convenor, 082 571 3334
  • Adriaan Basson – SANEF Treasurer, 0825622113
  • Kate Skinner – SANEF Executive Director 082 926 6404